Grading State Disclosure 2005 Logo Graphic

W a s h i n g t o n

Grade
Rank
A-
1

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
A-
2
Electronic Filing Program
A+
1
Disclosure Content Accessibility
A+
1
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
B-
6

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Washington

For the third year in a row, Washington state’s campaign disclosure program tops the charts at number one in the country, with particularly strong performances in the areas of Electronic Filing and Disclosure Content Accessibility, and a campaign disclosure law that is second only to California’s.

Washington’s disclosure law requires candidates to report detailed information about contributors giving over $25, including occupation and employer for those donating over $100. Last-minute contributions must be reported prior to Election Day. Disclosure of campaign expenditures is particularly strong, with candidates providing detailed information about vendors, subvendors and accrued expenses. Independent expenditures are disclosed, and those made in the three weeks leading up to the election must be disclosed within 24 hours. The Public Disclosure Commission makes electronic filing software available free of charge, and electronic filing is required of candidates spending over $10,000.

Washington received 100 percent of the possible points for Disclosure Content Accessibility and once again ranked first in this category. The Public Disclosure Commission continues to offer exceptional access to campaign disclosure records, giving visitors to the agency’s web site the ability to either browse disclosure filings or search a comprehensive database of itemized contributions and expenditures on a number of fields. Access to paper copies of disclosure records is excellent, and the agency also offers data on CD.

After receiving a C- in 2003 and an A- in 2004, Washington landed in the middle with a B- for Online Contextual and Technical Usability this year. The drop was due to a lower usability test score in 2005, with testers reporting some confusion over site terminology and expressing less confidence in their ability to accurately answer questions about the governor’s fundraising activity using information on the site. Still, the Public Disclosure Commission’s web site includes a number of great resources to help site users put campaign data into a larger context, including a series of “Election Financing Fact Books” going back to 1976, and detailed information about the state’s disclosure laws and requirements.

Quick Fix: Add the complete reporting period to the index of candidates’ reports.

Editor’s Pick: The “Campaign Reporting Pocket Guide,” which is a condensed quick-reference guide to Washington’s campaign finance restrictions and disclosure rules. View image

Disclosure Agency: Public Disclosure Commission
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.pdc.wa.gov

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


This page was first published on October 26, 2005
| Last updated on October 26, 2005
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.