Grading State Disclosure 2005 Logo Graphic

S o u t h . C a r o l i n a

Grade
Rank
F
49

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
C+
24
Electronic Filing Program
F
38
Disclosure Content Accessibility
F
50
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
F
46

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in South Carolina

For the third year in a row, South Carolina received an F in the study and ranked 49th overall. There is still no campaign finance data on the state’s disclosure web site, despite the fact that sweeping campaign finance and disclosure reforms were passed and signed into law in 2003.

South Carolina’s disclosure law is its strong point, and requires candidates to report detailed information about contributors giving over $100, including occupation but not employer. Disclosure of loan details is strong, and candidates must report details of all expenditures, including subvendor payments and accrued expenses. Independent expenditures are disclosed, however neither last-minute independent expenditures nor last-minute contributions are reported prior to Election Day. The State Ethics Commission was slow to put out bids for development of an e-filing program, though the law requires that candidates file electronically, but is now working with a vendor and plans to have a program in place by early 2006.

Two years after South Carolina passed disclosure reform, the State Ethics Commission web site still contains no campaign finance reports or even summaries of total amounts raised and spent by all state-level candidates. That fact is why the state again received an F and ranked last in the country for Disclosure Content Accessibility. The Commission plans to post electronic filings online beginning in 2006, but if those plans should be delayed, a relatively simple backup option would be posting candidate filings online as scanned images.  In the meantime, the state could reduce the cost of paper copies of disclosure reports, which is currently $.50 per page.

Not surprisingly, South Carolina’s web site usability grade continues to suffer from the lack of campaign data on the state’s disclosure web site, though the site does include some information to help the public understand the state’s disclosure rules and requirements. One of the “Major Achievements of the Past Year” included in the agency’s annual report on the 2003-2004 fiscal year was the “availability of all Commission forms online” in PDF; considering this development a major achievement provides some insight into where the agency has been, technologically speaking, and how far it still has to go.

Quick Fix: Lower the cost of paper copies of disclosure records.

Editor’s Pick: The disclosure agency’s complete contact information is displayed prominently at the top of the disclosure web site. View image

Disclosure Agency: State Ethics Commission
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.state.sc.us/ethics

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


This page was first published on October 26, 2005
| Last updated on October 26, 2005
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.