Grading State Disclosure 2005 Logo Graphic

O k l a h o m a

Grade
Rank
C
19

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
B
13
Electronic Filing Program
F
35
Disclosure Content Accessibility
B
15
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
D-
37

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Oklahoma

Oklahoma’s campaign disclosure program ranked 19th in the country for the second year in a row, though its overall grade improved from a C- to a C in 2005, mostly due to improvements in the area of web site usability. The state’s campaign disclosure law is its biggest strength.

Oklahoma law requires that candidates report detailed information about contributors giving more than $50, including occupation and employer.  Large, last-minute contributions are disclosed prior to Election Day, as are last-minute independent expenditures. Candidates must report all expenditures, including subvendor information, but not accrued expenses. A new administrative rule will make electronic filing mandatory for all statewide and legislative candidates raising or spending over $20,000 per campaign, but does not take effect until July 2006.

The state again received a B for Disclosure Content Accessibility, and while its rank in this category is high, there is still room for improvement. The searchable databases of contributions and expenditures on Oklahoma’s disclosure web site are well-designed and include a number of search options, but still only contain records for 25 percent of the candidates who file with the disclosure agency. For the 75 percent who file reports on paper rather than electronically, only summary data is available online; members of the public wishing to view itemized contributions to the governor’s campaign committee, for example, must request paper copies of those records from the Ethics Commission in Oklahoma City.

Oklahoma’s grade for web site usability rose from an F to a D, because the Commission’s web site now has more complete information about campaign finance restrictions, and because the state’s score in the usability test improved in 2005. While most testers felt the site’s terminology was easy to understand, only half felt confident they could accurately answer questions about the governor’s fundraising using data from the site.

Quick Fix: Add the ability to search the database by expenditure purpose. This information already shows up in the search results, so it should be relatively simple to add one more field to the search interface.

Editor’s Pick: Index of reports for each committee is nicely designed and includes a column showing whether a report was filed on paper or electronically. View image

Disclosure Agency: Ethics Commission
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.ethics.state.ok.us

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


This page was first published on October 26, 2005
| Last updated on October 26, 2005
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.