Grading State Disclosure 2005 Logo Graphic

I d a h o

Grade
Rank
C
20

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
B-
20
Electronic Filing Program
F
38
Disclosure Content Accessibility
C-
23
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
A
1

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Idaho

Idaho’s clear strength is in the usability of its disclosure web site, which improved further and helped the state climb from a C- to a C overall. The lack of even a voluntary electronic filing program is still a significant shortcoming, and prevents the state from achieving a higher overall rank and grade.

Idaho’s disclosure law, which is slightly above average by this project’s criteria, requires candidates to report details about contributors giving more than $50 and expenditures of at least $25. Expenditure disclosure is particularly strong and requires reporting of information about subvendors and accrued expenses. Last-minute contributions and independent expenditures must be reported before Election Day, and the law’s enforcement provisions, including mandatory desk reviews and field audits, are strong. Idaho still does not offer candidates the option of filing reports electronically, one of only thirteen states without such a program.

While Idaho does offer the public a comprehensive searchable database of contributions, its disclosure web site still lacks an interface for searching campaign expenditures and there are still problems with data consistency, as described in previous Grading State Disclosure reports. Also, there are some fields missing from the searchable database, and disclosure records cannot be sorted either there or in the browsable filings. A recent change in the law requires candidates for statewide office to file an additional statement mid-year in non-election years, and those filings are now online.

Idaho made enough gains in Online Contextual and Technical Usability to jump from a B to an A, and perhaps more significantly, to move into 1st place in this category in 2005, up from 7th in 2004. The state’s performance in the usability tests improved substantially, with most testers finding the terminology and interface easy to understand, and giving the site an overall high rating. Summary information is excellent, as noted below, and the Secretary of State’s web site is well-designed and easy to navigate.

Quick Fix: Add contribution date and contributor zip code fields to the searchable database of contributions, and add ability to sort itemized contribution records.

Editor’s Pick: 2004 Sunshine Summary, and additional summary information going back to 1994. View image

Disclosure Agency: Secretary of State
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.idsos.state.id.us

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


This page was first published on October 26, 2005
| Last updated on October 26, 2005
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.