Grading State Disclosure 2004 Logo Graphic

C a l i f o r n i a

Grade
Rank
B+
3

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
A
1
Electronic Filing Program
A
15
Disclosure Content Accessibility
A
5
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
D+
21

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in California

A lower grade in the web site usability category bumped California from 2nd to 3rd place in the overall rankings this year, but the state still has one of the best disclosure programs in the country, with strengths particularly in the areas of disclosure law and data accessibility.

Candidates in California must report the name, address, occupation and employer of donors who give $100 or more to their campaigns.  Last-minute contributions must be disclosed before Election Day. The law requires detailed disclosure of all expenditures of $100 or more, including a breakdown of subvendor information. The only deficiency in the state’s law, as measured by this project’s criteria, is that the dates expenditures are made are not required to be reported, though many committees report this information anyway. Electronic filing is mandatory for state-level candidates who reach a $50,000 threshold, and as of September 2005, candidates can file reports using a new, free web-based filing system on the Secretary of State’s web site.

California’s “Cal-Access” web site features searchable contribution and expenditure databases of electronically-filed campaign data going back to 2000. The functionality of those databases and the fact that reports are available online in real-time as they are filed, place California in the top five states in the country for Disclosure Content Accessibility. One major limitation of Cal-Access is that once a filing has been amended, the original report is no longer linked from the committee’s filing history page, though it is still online. To give site visitors an even more complete picture of each candidate’s campaign finance activity, the agency could provide links to both original and amended reports.

The state’s grade for Online Contextual and Technical Usability dropped from a B+ to a D+ in 2005, due to a far lower score on the usability test this year than in 2004. Testers had trouble finding summary campaign finance figures for the governor, lacked confidence in the accuracy of the figures they did locate, and universally found the site confusing. The poor usability test scores may be a reflection of any number of things relating to the site structure or the data itself, including perhaps that there are no less than seven campaign committees associated with the current governor.

Quick Fix: Add information about campaign finance restrictions. The Cal-Access web site could be improved by adding some written information or even a simple chart about campaign fundraising and spending rules.

Editor’s Pick: Comprehensive 18-page User Guide and quick reference guide for the searchable databases. View image

Disclosure Agency: Secretary of State
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.sos.ca.gov

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


This page was first published on October 26, 2005
| Last updated on October 26, 2005
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.