Grading State Disclosure 2005 Logo Graphic

A r k a n s a s

Grade
Rank
F
37

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
C
32
Electronic Filing Program
F
38
Disclosure Content Accessibility
F
44
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
D+
19

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Arkansas

A persistent, low F in the Disclosure Content Accessibility category and a lack of electronic filing combine to give Arkansas another overall F, but the state’s overall rank continued to improve, climbing to 37th in 2005.

Arkansas’ average campaign finance law is the bright spot in the state’s disclosure system, requiring candidates to report detailed information about contributors giving $50 or more, including occupation and employer.  Expenditures above $99 are also disclosed, but reports do not include subvendor information. Reports of independent expenditures are thin on details, such as who benefits from the expenditure and cumulative amount spent; neither contributions nor independent expenditures made right before the election are disclosed until after Election Day. While Arkansas still does not have an electronic filing program in place, representatives of the Secretary of State’s office report they are currently researching e-filing systems and hope to implement one soon.

The strength of Arkansas’ campaign disclosure web site in the past has been its comprehensiveness and the speed with which candidate filings are scanned and posted online. However, one news organization did report a significant slowdown in the posting of those filings to the Secretary of State’s site in the months leading up to the 2004 general election. One obvious way to avoid such delays is to implement electronic filing; taking that step would also improve the readability of the reports, some of which are poorly handwritten and display sideways on the screen, rendering them nearly impossible to read online.

The only category in which Arkansas made measurable improvements in 2005 was Online Contextual and Technical Usability. The state’s grade in this area rose from an F and rank of 38, to a D+ and rank of 19, a result of a big improvement in Arkansas’ performance in the web site usability test. All of the testers located the specific campaign finance data they were looking for, and all expressed confidence in the accuracy of the site.

Quick Fix: Make information about campaign finance rules more visible.  Site visitors may find it difficult to locate information about campaign fundraising and spending restrictions, which is now in the “Ethics Reporting Forms” section of the web site. The agency could make those rules more visible by featuring them elsewhere or changing the name of the “Reporting Forms” link to better reflect what is available there.

Editor’s Pick: Monthly filing of disclosure reports in election years.

Disclosure Agency: Secretary of State
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.sosweb.state.ar.us

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


This page was first published on October 26, 2005
| Last updated on October 26, 2005
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.