Grading State Disclosure 2004 Logo Graphic

R h o d e . I s l a n d

Grade
Rank
B-
7

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
C
25
Electronic Filing Program
A+
1
Disclosure Content Accessibility
A
2
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
D+
18

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Rhode Island

Changes to Rhode Island’s electronic filing mandate and a number two rank in Disclosure Content Accessibility bumped the state from a C to a B- overall, and turned its disclosure program into one of the ten best in the nation.

Rhode Island law requires candidates to file quarterly statements in non-election years, and three or more statements before each election.  Candidates must disclose details for contributors who give $100 or more, including their employers.  Last-minute contributions are disclosed prior to the election only by statewide candidates receiving matching funds; other candidates report such contributions after the election.  Expenditures over $100 must be disclosed, but subvendor information is not reported.  Independent expenditures are reported, and last-minute independent expenditures are disclosed before the election.  Electronic filing is now required for all statewide and legislative candidates, resulting in a jump from a C to an A+ in the Electronic Filing Program category.

Rhode Island not only excels at providing the public with access to campaign finance records, but has improved in 2004 and now shares the number two spot in Disclosure Content Accessibility with Michigan.  The Board of Elections web site features comprehensive databases of contributions and expenditures that are well designed and offer a variety of searching and sorting options.  Data can be downloaded in an Excel-compatible format, and complete filings can be browsed through a user-friendly interface.  Rhode Island also provides excellent access to paper copies of disclosure records.

Online Contextual and Technical Usability is the one area in which Rhode Island’s performance falls below average, and its D+ grade – although it is up from last year’s F – shows there is still room for improvement.   There is still no overview information comparing amounts raised and spent by all candidates, a resource that is weighted heavily in the Grading State Disclosure criteria.  Another important deficiency is an inadequate data history section to help people understand which reports can be found online.  It became easier to locate the Board of Elections web site through a search of the main state site, which likely improved Rhode Island’s usability testing score.  Also contributing to the higher grade was the availability of an easily accessible and comprehensive list of state level candidates.

Disclosure Agency: Board of Elections
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.elections.state.ri.us

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page

View another state's summary:

 


This page was first published on October 25, 2004
| Last updated on October 25, 2004
copyright © Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.