Grading State Disclosure 2004 Logo Graphic

O k l a h o m a

Grade
Rank
C-
19

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
B
13
Electronic Filing Program
F
22
Disclosure Content Accessibility
B
12
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
F
42

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Oklahoma

The quality of Oklahoma’s campaign disclosure web site improved significantly in 2004, although the changes have barely impacted the state’s overall grade, which moved up to a C- from last year’s D+.  Oklahoma again earned an overall rank of 19 for its campaign disclosure program.

Oklahoma law requires candidates to file quarterly reports in both election and non-election years, plus one report before each election.  Candidates must disclose detailed information about contributors who give more than $50, including occupation and employer.  Last-minute contributions of $500 or more must be reported within 24 hours.  All expenditures must be reported, including detailed subvendor information.  Independent expenditures must be disclosed as well, and last-minute independent expenditures of $500 or more must be reported prior to the election.  The Ethics Commission is considering reinstating mandatory electronic filing beginning in 2005, but for now the program is voluntary.

Oklahoma debuted a new campaign disclosure web site in 2004, called OkCIDS, which is tied to an updated electronic filing system and replaced the state’s original online disclosure database.  While the upgrade did not improve Oklahoma’s Disclosure Content Accessibility grade – the old system also satisfied the project’s criteria for database functionality and received full credit – the OkCIDS web site is a big improvement in both design and technical operation.  The new database is still not comprehensive, however; while there are more campaign filings in the OkCIDS system than were previously available, paper filers’ information is limited to summary figures, and complete paper-filed reports are only accessible through the Oklahoma Ethics Commission office.

Oklahoma made no progress in the area of Online Contextual and Technical Usability in 2004, perhaps because its focus was on changes to the electronic filing process and improvements in the area of accessibility to campaign data.  The state’s grade and rank in the web site usability category are still very low.  While there are now more complete instructions for viewing campaign filings online, the disclosure web site is still lacking summary information comparing total amounts raised and spent by different filers, a comprehensive list of candidates, and a detailed description of whose records are available in the OkCIDS database.

Disclosure Agency: Ethics Commission
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.ethics.state.ok.us

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page

View another state's summary:

 


This page was first published on October 25, 2004
| Last updated on October 25, 2004
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.