Grading State Disclosure 2004 Logo Graphic

O h i o

Grade
Rank
B-
7

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
C
25
Electronic Filing Program
A+
1
Disclosure Content Accessibility
A-
7
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
C
12

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Ohio

Ohio experienced a big jump in its Online Contextual and Technical Usability grade and rank in 2004, which caused the state’s overall grade to improve from a C+ to a B-.  Other states advanced in the areas of law, electronic filing, and web site usability while Ohio’s performance in those categories was fairly static, causing the state’s overall rank to drop from four to seven.

Under Ohio law, candidates must file once in non-election years and twice before each election.  Detailed information about contributors must be disclosed, including occupation and employer information for those who give over $100.  Large last-minute contributions, not including those made to legislative candidates, must be reported prior to the election.  All expenditures must be reported, but subvendor information is not disclosed.  Independent expenditures must be reported, but there is no last-minute independent expenditure reporting.  Electronic filing is mandatory for candidates reaching a $10,000 threshold.

Ohio’s strength, along with its electronic filing program, is in Disclosure Content Accessibility.  The Secretary of State’s web site features comprehensive databases of contributions and expenditures that are filled with both current and historical campaign finance data.  Search results can be sorted on six fields and downloaded, and the web site offers a special section for downloading large amounts of data in previously queried files.  The site also features an interface for browsing complete campaign finance filings by candidate.  New information about the process by which the state fulfills requests for paper copies of records resulted in a slight drop in Ohio’s score in this category.

The usability of Ohio’s disclosure web site improved significantly in 2004, and the state’s grade in the Online Contextual and Technical Usability category rose from an F to a C.  The availability of a comprehensive list of candidates, and the fact that it became easier to locate the disclosure web site through a search of the main Ohio web site, contributed to the increase.  Ohio could add the reporting periods to browsable campaign finance reports, clearly label amended reports and retain original filings online, and work with the main state web department to include the term “campaign finance” in the “Government” menu on Ohio’s homepage to improve further in this area.

Disclosure Agency: Secretary of State
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.state.oh.us/sos

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page

View another state's summary:

 


This page was first published on October 25, 2004
| Last updated on October 25, 2004
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.