Grading State Disclosure 2004 Logo Graphic

N e b r a s k a

Grade
Rank
F
36

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
B-
17
Electronic Filing Program
F
39
Disclosure Content Accessibility
F
36
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
F
32

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Nebraska

There has been little movement since 2003 in the campaign finance disclosure arena in Nebraska, a fact that is underscored by the state’s unchanged overall grade and rank.  Nebraska’s strength still lies in its campaign finance disclosure law, and its most significant weakness in Disclosure Content Accessibility.

Nebraska law requires candidates to file one campaign finance statement in non-election years and two before each election.  Details for contributions greater than $250 must be reported, but a contributor’s occupation and employer are not required to be disclosed.  Last-minute contributions of $1,000 or more must be reported prior to the election.  Details must be disclosed for expenditures greater than $250, but subvendor information is not required.  Independent expenditures of $250 or more must be disclosed, and large last-minute independent expenditures must be reported before the election.  There is no electronic filing of campaign finance reports in Nebraska.

Nebraska again received an F for Disclosure Content Accessibility, even though the Accountability and Disclosure Commission web site contains all campaign finance filings.  Reports are posted to the site quickly, but the format makes it extremely difficult to analyze the campaign finance data.  Records are displayed in computer-generated PDF files following data entry of reports by agency staff, which makes the lack of searchable databases of contributions and expenditures all the more surprising.  There is no reason why data that is already computerized should be displayed online in a static format, rather than a searchable database, downloadable Excel-compatible files, or at the very least a sortable HTML format.

There is significant room for improvement in Nebraska in the area of web site usability, most notably in contextual usability.  The disclosure web site lacks summary information to give the public a better overview of candidates’ fundraising and spending totals.  Also missing is an in-depth explanation of whose records are available online and what time period is covered by the reports.  For user-friendliness and ease of navigation, the Accountability and Disclosure Commission web site design needs to be unified.  Page backgrounds vary widely in color and pattern, some to the point of being distracting; instead of focusing on the information on the page, the site user focuses on taking in each new page design and trying to understand the structure of the site.  It became easier to locate the disclosure web site from the main Nebraska homepage, which likely contributed to the slight increase in the state’s usability testing score.

Disclosure Agency: Nebraska Accountability and Disclosure Commission
Disclosure Web Site:
http://nadc.nol.org

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page

View another state's summary:

 


This page was first published on October 25, 2004
| Last updated on October 25, 2004
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.