Grading State Disclosure 2004 Logo Graphic

M i c h i g a n

Grade
Rank
B
6

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
C
29
Electronic Filing Program
A+
1
Disclosure Content Accessibility
A
2
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
B-
9

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Michigan

Michigan implemented mandatory electronic filing in 2004, raising its grade in that category from an F to an A+, and its overall grade from a C to a B.  The state’s campaign disclosure program is now among the top six in the nation, with a particularly strong showing in the area of Disclosure Content Accessibility.

Michigan law requires candidates to file one statement in non-election years and one statement eleven days before an election.  Details of all contributions must be disclosed, including occupation and employer for contributions above $100.  Last-minute contributions are required to be disclosed prior to an election.  Expenditures of $50 or more are required to be disclosed, but subvendor information is not reported.  Independent expenditures and last-minute independent expenditures are also required to be disclosed before an election.  Electronic filing is now mandatory for both statewide and legislative candidates who reach a threshold of $20,000.

Michigan ranks second in the country (tied with Rhode Island) for accessibility of campaign finance records, and is one of only four states that received full credit for its searchable contribution and expenditure databases.  The databases are excellent and contain some unique search capabilities, including the ability to search for a range of zip codes, and for a particular type of get-out-the-vote activity expense.  Reports filed on paper – a number that is dwindling with the new electronic filing requirement – are available only as images on the Secretary of State’s web site and are not entered into the searchable databases.

The state’s Online Contextual and Technical Usability grade jumped from a D to a B- in 2004, largely due to a much-improved usability testing score.  Specific improvements to the disclosure web site include the addition of full contact information for the Bureau of Elections and more complete information about the state’s disclosure requirements.  A comprehensive list of candidates and a good description of which records are available online also contribute to the high rank in this category.  The addition of current and historical overview information showing total amounts raised and spent by all state candidates would further improve Michigan’s usability grade.

Disclosure Agency: Department of State
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.michigan.gov/sos

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page

View another state's summary:

 


This page was first published on October 25, 2004
| Last updated on October 25, 2004
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.