Grading State Disclosure 2004 Logo Graphic

M a r y l a n d

Grade
Rank
C
16

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
F
41
Electronic Filing Program
A+
1
Disclosure Content Accessibility
A-
6
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
D
20

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Maryland

There was no change to Maryland’s score and grade in 2004, but its overall rank dropped from 12 to 16 as other states made improvements.  Maryland’s campaign disclosure law and the usability of its disclosure web site are still the state’s main weaknesses.

Maryland law requires candidates to file annual reports in non-election years and one report before an election.  Candidates must disclose detailed information for all contributions greater than $51, but a contributor’s occupation and employer do not have to be reported and last-minute contributions do not have to be disclosed before an election.  Details about all expenditures, except subvendor information, must be reported.  Maryland is one of eleven states that does not require the disclosure of independent expenditures, which is a significant weakness in the law.  Electronic filling is mandatory for statewide and legislative candidates who reach a threshold of $5,000.

Access to campaign finance data in Maryland is excellent, and the state ranks sixth in the nation in this category.  All campaign finance reports are available and searchable through the databases of contributions and expenditures on the State Board of Elections web site.  There is a summary at the top of the search results page showing not only the total number of records retrieved, but also the total amount of the contributions or expenditures, and the smallest and largest amounts.  Records can be sorted online or downloaded, and there is an interface for browsing complete reports.  Access to paper copies of reports is also good, although at $.25 per page the cost is somewhat prohibitive.

Maryland has significant room to improve in the area of Online Contextual and Technical Usability.  While there is some interesting statistical information on the disclosure web site, there is still no simple list comparing candidates’ total fundraising and spending figures.  Original filings are not retained online after amendments have been posted, and browsable reports do not include the complete reporting periods.  Strengths in this area include a comprehensive candidate list, good information about disclosure requirements and campaign finance restrictions, and a section called “Understanding the Campaign Finance Database” that gives site visitors a better sense of the scope of the records available online.

Disclosure Agency: State Board of Elections
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.elections.state.md.us

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page

View another state's summary:

 


This page was first published on October 25, 2004
| Last updated on October 25, 2004
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.