Grading State Disclosure 2008 Logo Graphic

V e r m o n t

Grade
Rank
F
43

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
C-
40
Electronic Filing Program
F
43
Disclosure Content Accessibility
F
42
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
D
40

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in Vermont

Vermont has earned an F in each of the five Grading State Disclosure assessments conducted since 2003, and ranked 43rd in 2008. Despite dropping from 31st to 40th in the usability category rankings since last year, Vermont improved from a D- to a D in this area in 2008.

Vermont earned a C- again in the disclosure law category and ranked 40th in 2008. Candidates are required to report the name and address of contributors giving over $100, but occupation and employer data are not disclosed. Each expenditure made by a candidate must be reported by payee, date, and amount, though subvendor data is not reported. Vermont requires candidates to report large, last-minute contributions within 24 hours and individuals or groups making independent mass media expenditures over $500 must also disclose such expenditures before Election Day. Penalties for campaign finance violations are strong, though the law does not require mandatory reviews or audits of disclosure reports. While Vermont does not currently operate an electronic filing program, the Secretary of State’s office has started planning for a program to begin by 2010.

Vermont ranked 42nd and received an F again in the Disclosure Content Accessibility category in 2008. The Secretary of State’s office scans and posts all state-level disclosure reports online within four days of receiving them. All reports can be browsed as TIFF files, but the data within these reports cannot be searched, sorted, or downloaded, and the TIFF format can make the files difficult to view on a computer screen. Data from statewide candidates’ disclosure reports is slightly more accessible as these records are also presented as searchable text files that can be downloaded for offline analysis. The Secretary of State’s office provides excellent access to paper copies of disclosure reports and charges just $.06 per page for copies.

Vermont improved from a D- in 2007 to a D in the usability category with a stronger performance on the 2008 usability test. While the usability testers were able to complete their tasks more quickly this year, most testers still reported confusion and rated their experiences on the site unfavorably. The Secretary of State’s site does offer a fair amount of contextual information to the public, such as detailed listings of candidates, clearly labeled amended reports, explanations of the state’s campaign finance regulations, and the ability to view historical data going back to 1916. Unfortunately, in 2005, the legislature removed a requirement that the Secretary of State’s office produce a summary of the totals raised and spent by candidates in each election and so the overviews featured on the site end with the 2004 elections.

Quick Fix: Allow users to select more than one candidate at a time through the site’s “Historical Campaign Finance Database”. This step would allow users to more easily compare campaign finance activity between candidates.

Editor’s Pick: The “Historical Campaign Finance Database” contains information on candidates for statewide and legislative office going back to 1916. View image

Disclosure Agency: Secretary of State
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.sec.state.vt.us

View past summaries of this state

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


First published September 17, 2008
| Last updated September 17 2008
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.