Grading State Disclosure 2004 Logo Graphic

C a l i f o r n i a

Honor
Grade
Rank
A
2

golden bar divider

Subcategories
Grade
Rank
Campaign Disclosure Law
A
1
Electronic Filing Program
A-
24
Disclosure Content Accessibility
A
7
Online Contextual & Technical Usability
B+
7

Grading Process green cube Subcategory Weighting green cube Methodology green cube Glossary

golden bar divider

The State of Disclosure in California

California improved from a B+ to an A, its highest grade in the Grading State Disclosure series, and ranked 2nd again in 2008. Strong gains made in the usability category helped California earn an A or B in all four scoring categories for the first time since 2004. 

California maintained the number one ranking in the law category, and has earned an A in this area in each of the five assessments. Strengths of the law include detailed contributor disclosure, including occupation and employer data; last-minute contribution and independent expenditure reporting; and strong enforcement provisions. Candidates must report campaign expenses, including those made by subvendors, but California does not require campaigns to report the dates of their expenses. California earned an A- again for its electronic filing program, which is mandatory for all statewide and legislative candidates who raise or spend $50,000.

After earning an F in the accessibility category in 2003, California has since earned an A in this category and a place in the top ten in each of the last four assessments, ranking 7th in 2008. All electronically-filed reports are available on the state’s “Cal-Access” web site going back to 2000, with new reports becoming available online immediately upon filing. The disclosure site features browsable PDF versions of electronic reports, HTML displays of itemized contribution and expenditure data, and searchable databases of contributions and expenditures that are among the best in the nation. Itemized transactions can be sorted and downloaded through both the searchable databases and HTML displays. While most paper-filed disclosure reports are not available online, the Secretary of State’s office began scanning and posting paper-filed late contribution reports to the web in 2008.

California’s usability grade improved to a B+ and 7th place ranking in 2008, up from a C and 19th in 2007. Improvements were driven by the addition of a thorough instruction manual for using the state’s disclosure web site and a stronger performance on the 2008 usability test. Usability testers expressed greater confidence in the data on the site and rated their overall experience on the site more favorably than testers did in 2007. The new user’s manual offers a wealth of information on both the contents of the web site and information about the state’s disclosure requirements. The site allows users to easily compare campaign finances between candidates and provides clear explanations of what data is available online. To improve further in this area, the agency could retain original filings alongside amended reports, rather than only listing the most recent amendment.

Quick Fix: Provide better visual clues for accessing and searching the online databases by changing the label from “Advanced Search” to “Search Contributions and Expenditures”. This impressive feature on the site could be easily missed by site visitors due to the inconspicuous placement of the link on the main page, and a label that might be intimidating to novice users.

Editor’s Pick: The Cal-Access Users Manual offers excellent instructions to the public about conducting both basic and advanced campaign finance research. View image

 

Disclosure Agency: Secretary of State
Disclosure Web Site:
http://www.sos.ca.gov

View past summaries of this state

View another state's summary:

Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page


First published September 17, 2008
| Last updated September 17 2008
copyright ©
Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.